<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 340 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207313</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was partly allowed, confirming the duty demand and interest already paid by the appellant. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority, citing various case laws where Education Cess was not required to be paid on Paper cess. The appellant&#039;s request for non-imposition of penalty was accepted, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 340 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207313</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was partly allowed, confirming the duty demand and interest already paid by the appellant. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority, citing various case laws where Education Cess was not required to be paid on Paper cess. The appellant&#039;s request for non-imposition of penalty was accepted, and the impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>