https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207307 A photocopy of a power of attorney cannot be treated as proved merely because a party admits the signature; secondary evidence is admissible only after the original's non-production is properly explained and the foundational requirements are satisfied. Admission of signature does not amount to admission of the document's contents or its evidentiary worth. The text also states that a first appellate court must independently reassess the evidence, frame the points for determination, and record reasoned findings on all material issues under Order XLI Rule 31 CPC; selective or general concurrence is insufficient. It further notes that failure to do so renders the appellate judgment legally unsustainable. en-us Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207307 A photocopy of a power of attorney cannot be treated as proved merely because a party admits the signature; secondary evidence is admissible only after the original's non-production is properly explained and the foundational requirements are satisfied. Admission of signature does not amount to admission of the document's contents or its evidentiary worth. The text also states that a first appellate court must independently reassess the evidence, frame the points for determination, and record reasoned findings on all material issues under Order XLI Rule 31 CPC; selective or general concurrence is insufficient. It further notes that failure to do so renders the appellate judgment legally unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207307