<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 719 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207302</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the petition, modifying the penalty imposed under section 271FA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It acknowledged a reasonable cause for the petitioner&#039;s unawareness of statutory obligations until the notice served on December 17, 2008. The penalty was to be recalculated from that date at Rs. 100 per day of default. The matter was remitted for penalty computation, with the rule made absolute to this extent and no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 719 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207302</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the petition, modifying the penalty imposed under section 271FA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It acknowledged a reasonable cause for the petitioner&#039;s unawareness of statutory obligations until the notice served on December 17, 2008. The penalty was to be recalculated from that date at Rs. 100 per day of default. The matter was remitted for penalty computation, with the rule made absolute to this extent and no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>