<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 662 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207286</link>
    <description>In a dispute over discharge of service tax liability through utilisation of Cenvat credit, the controversy was treated as raising a question of law on whether immediate pre-deposit should be insisted upon during the appeal. The tribunal noted that the appellant was for the time being deprived of using the Cenvat credit and that this weighed against requiring upfront deposit pending the appeal. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 662 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207286</link>
      <description>In a dispute over discharge of service tax liability through utilisation of Cenvat credit, the controversy was treated as raising a question of law on whether immediate pre-deposit should be insisted upon during the appeal. The tribunal noted that the appellant was for the time being deprived of using the Cenvat credit and that this weighed against requiring upfront deposit pending the appeal. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>