<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 379 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207285</link>
    <description>Imported tibial insert implants were treated as eligible for exemption because the notification, as amended, covered assistive devices, rehabilitation aids and goods for disabled persons, including instruments and implants for severely physically handicapped patients and joint replacement implants. On that construction, the goods fell within the exempted description, and denial of the exemption was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 379 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207285</link>
      <description>Imported tibial insert implants were treated as eligible for exemption because the notification, as amended, covered assistive devices, rehabilitation aids and goods for disabled persons, including instruments and implants for severely physically handicapped patients and joint replacement implants. On that construction, the goods fell within the exempted description, and denial of the exemption was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>