https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207280 The CESTAT, New Delhi noted that the appellants were required to make a reduced pre-deposit under the stay order, as modified by the High Court, and the order expressly provided that non-compliance would lead to dismissal of the appeal. No compliance report was filed and no explanation was offered for the default. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the pre-deposit condition as unfulfilled and dismissed the appeals for failure to comply with the deposit requirement. en-us Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207280 The CESTAT, New Delhi noted that the appellants were required to make a reduced pre-deposit under the stay order, as modified by the High Court, and the order expressly provided that non-compliance would lead to dismissal of the appeal. No compliance report was filed and no explanation was offered for the default. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the pre-deposit condition as unfulfilled and dismissed the appeals for failure to comply with the deposit requirement. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207280