<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 657 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207278</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed with consequential relief. The impugned order was set aside to the extent of the rejection of the refund claim amounting to Rs. 103240 and Rs. 67238. The lower authority&#039;s denial of the refund claim without issuing a show cause notice and based on incorrect calculation of proportionate Cenvat credit and procedural lapses in the input excise invoices was found unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 657 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207278</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed with consequential relief. The impugned order was set aside to the extent of the rejection of the refund claim amounting to Rs. 103240 and Rs. 67238. The lower authority&#039;s denial of the refund claim without issuing a show cause notice and based on incorrect calculation of proportionate Cenvat credit and procedural lapses in the input excise invoices was found unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>