<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 478 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the disallowance of foreign travel expenses due to insufficient proof of business purpose. The appeal concerning marketing expenses was rejected, emphasizing that the necessity of expenses should not be judged from a businessman&#039;s perspective. The Tribunal upheld the 2% disallowance of kitchen expenses, stating that detailed verification of each voucher would be impractical.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 478 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the disallowance of foreign travel expenses due to insufficient proof of business purpose. The appeal concerning marketing expenses was rejected, emphasizing that the necessity of expenses should not be judged from a businessman&#039;s perspective. The Tribunal upheld the 2% disallowance of kitchen expenses, stating that detailed verification of each voucher would be impractical.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>