<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 477 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207271</link>
    <description>The court held that the reassessment notices issued under sections 147 and 148 were invalid due to being based on a mere change of opinion and being issued beyond the permissible limitation period. Consequently, the court quashed the notices, terminated related proceedings, allowed the writ petitions, and directed each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 477 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207271</link>
      <description>The court held that the reassessment notices issued under sections 147 and 148 were invalid due to being based on a mere change of opinion and being issued beyond the permissible limitation period. Consequently, the court quashed the notices, terminated related proceedings, allowed the writ petitions, and directed each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>