<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 322 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay, appeal, and stay application, as the appellants failed to follow the Apex Court&#039;s directive to contest the case before the Tribunal, opting to continue with the High Court instead. The Tribunal found that the appellants did not act in good faith and could not rely on the case laws cited, leading to the dismissal of their applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 322 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay, appeal, and stay application, as the appellants failed to follow the Apex Court&#039;s directive to contest the case before the Tribunal, opting to continue with the High Court instead. The Tribunal found that the appellants did not act in good faith and could not rely on the case laws cited, leading to the dismissal of their applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>