<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 469 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207246</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions under sections 69B and 45(3). It affirmed that the Assessing Officer failed to provide substantial evidence for the additions and misapplied the relevant provisions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee in both instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 469 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207246</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions under sections 69B and 45(3). It affirmed that the Assessing Officer failed to provide substantial evidence for the additions and misapplied the relevant provisions, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee in both instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>