<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 811 - ITAT, Kolkata</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the AO&#039;s disallowance for FCI contract expenditures and reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition for undisclosed bank deposits. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS, except for the amount already sustained by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 811 - ITAT, Kolkata</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the AO&#039;s disallowance for FCI contract expenditures and reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition for undisclosed bank deposits. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS, except for the amount already sustained by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>