<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 65 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207198</link>
    <description>The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against penalties imposed on a cable operator under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal allowed the operator to deposit 25% of the penalty amount within 30 days, despite delayed payment, based on previous judgments. The Court upheld this decision, emphasizing that the option to reduce penalties to 25% should be available to the assessee, aligning with interpretations of Section 78 and promoting fairness in penalty imposition cases related to taxable services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 65 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207198</link>
      <description>The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against penalties imposed on a cable operator under the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal allowed the operator to deposit 25% of the penalty amount within 30 days, despite delayed payment, based on previous judgments. The Court upheld this decision, emphasizing that the option to reduce penalties to 25% should be available to the assessee, aligning with interpretations of Section 78 and promoting fairness in penalty imposition cases related to taxable services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>