<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 62 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207184</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision to reject the applications for condonation of delay. The Court found that the appellants did not act in good faith and failed to establish undue hardship. The appellants were given four weeks to comply with the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s direction, failing which their appeals would stand dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 62 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207184</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision to reject the applications for condonation of delay. The Court found that the appellants did not act in good faith and failed to establish undue hardship. The appellants were given four weeks to comply with the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s direction, failing which their appeals would stand dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>