<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 302 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by Jindal Saw Ltd. for the refund of export duties wrongly paid, based on the effective date of the customs notification and the Let Export Order date&#039;s significance in determining the export duty rate. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed for lacking merit, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to a refund due to nil export duty on a specific date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 302 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by Jindal Saw Ltd. for the refund of export duties wrongly paid, based on the effective date of the customs notification and the Let Export Order date&#039;s significance in determining the export duty rate. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed for lacking merit, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to a refund due to nil export duty on a specific date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>