https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207160 The appeal challenged the refusal to modify an earlier interim order, with the appellant arguing that the Trial Judge should have disposed of the writ petition as directed by the Appeal Court. The delay in hearing the writ petition necessitated additional interim measures, despite the invocation of the alternative remedy principle. Concerns were raised about recovery from a third party, emphasizing that such recovery should be handled by the appropriate forum. The Court directed the disposal of the writ petition within a specified timeframe, maintaining the interim order until resolution. en-us Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207160 The appeal challenged the refusal to modify an earlier interim order, with the appellant arguing that the Trial Judge should have disposed of the writ petition as directed by the Appeal Court. The delay in hearing the writ petition necessitated additional interim measures, despite the invocation of the alternative remedy principle. Concerns were raised about recovery from a third party, emphasizing that such recovery should be handled by the appropriate forum. The Court directed the disposal of the writ petition within a specified timeframe, maintaining the interim order until resolution. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207160