<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 142 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the manufacturer&#039;s refund claims on service tax paid for various services, including catering, telephone, maintenance, clearing and forwarding, technical testing, management consultancy, and GTA services. The appellant successfully argued for refunds based on precedents and specific criteria for each service, such as the High Court&#039;s decision on catering services and the classification of certain services as &#039;input services&#039; under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal granted refunds for all services, recognizing their relevance to the manufacturing process and export activities, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 142 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the manufacturer&#039;s refund claims on service tax paid for various services, including catering, telephone, maintenance, clearing and forwarding, technical testing, management consultancy, and GTA services. The appellant successfully argued for refunds based on precedents and specific criteria for each service, such as the High Court&#039;s decision on catering services and the classification of certain services as &#039;input services&#039; under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal granted refunds for all services, recognizing their relevance to the manufacturing process and export activities, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>