<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 141 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207158</link>
    <description>Provisional assessment was required to be finalised afresh in light of directions already issued by the High Court in connected writ proceedings. The Tribunal noted that those judicial directions governed the course of finalisation, so the appellate forum should not itself conclusively determine the matter. The dispute was therefore sent back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration and fresh decision in accordance with law and the High Court&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 141 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207158</link>
      <description>Provisional assessment was required to be finalised afresh in light of directions already issued by the High Court in connected writ proceedings. The Tribunal noted that those judicial directions governed the course of finalisation, so the appellate forum should not itself conclusively determine the matter. The dispute was therefore sent back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration and fresh decision in accordance with law and the High Court&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>