<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 296 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207155</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Cost Plus Method (CPM) and Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in various transactions. It upheld the application of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) but emphasized the need for proper documentation and verification. The Tribunal found errors in the lower authorities&#039; decisions and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, stressing the importance of detailed and reasoned orders based on correct methodologies and thorough analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 296 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207155</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Cost Plus Method (CPM) and Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in various transactions. It upheld the application of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) but emphasized the need for proper documentation and verification. The Tribunal found errors in the lower authorities&#039; decisions and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, stressing the importance of detailed and reasoned orders based on correct methodologies and thorough analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>