<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 702 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207153</link>
    <description>Deduction of tax at source must be followed by deposit within the prescribed time for purposes of section 40(a)(ia); an assessee cannot justify non-deposit of current-year TDS by adjusting it against excess TDS deposited in an earlier year. The Board circular on refund or adjustment of excess TDS operates only in refund administration and does not displace the statutory deposit obligation once tax has been deducted. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 702 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207153</link>
      <description>Deduction of tax at source must be followed by deposit within the prescribed time for purposes of section 40(a)(ia); an assessee cannot justify non-deposit of current-year TDS by adjusting it against excess TDS deposited in an earlier year. The Board circular on refund or adjustment of excess TDS operates only in refund administration and does not displace the statutory deposit obligation once tax has been deducted. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>