<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 624 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207136</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the rectification of mistake application as time-barred, emphasizing the statutory limitation of six months for filing under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, without provision for condonation of delay. The application for condonation of delay was also dismissed, with the Tribunal highlighting its limited powers and inability to extend deadlines beyond what is prescribed by the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 624 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207136</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the rectification of mistake application as time-barred, emphasizing the statutory limitation of six months for filing under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, without provision for condonation of delay. The application for condonation of delay was also dismissed, with the Tribunal highlighting its limited powers and inability to extend deadlines beyond what is prescribed by the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>