https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207133 Confiscation of seized goods other than the GMDSS station was held unsustainable because the record lacked a clear factual finding that the items were unaccounted for or otherwise liable to confiscation; the confiscation was therefore set aside. The dispute over the GMDSS station required reconsideration because the Tribunal had not examined the applicable statutory framework governing possession and use of wireless equipment on foreign vessels in Indian waters, including the relevant permission regime. That issue was remanded for fresh decision after consideration of the law and evidence. en-us Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207133 Confiscation of seized goods other than the GMDSS station was held unsustainable because the record lacked a clear factual finding that the items were unaccounted for or otherwise liable to confiscation; the confiscation was therefore set aside. The dispute over the GMDSS station required reconsideration because the Tribunal had not examined the applicable statutory framework governing possession and use of wireless equipment on foreign vessels in Indian waters, including the relevant permission regime. That issue was remanded for fresh decision after consideration of the law and evidence. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207133