<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 133 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207130</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, remanded a case involving the denial of CENVAT credit amounting to Rs.28,127 due to missing original invoices. The appellant located four additional invoices and requested a review. Despite a prolonged timeline and incremental submission of invoices, the tribunal granted a final opportunity for the original adjudicating authority to assess the four specific invoices. The appellant agreed to cease submitting invoices in fragments, limiting the request for CENVAT credit to the identified invoices only. The matter was remanded for thorough evaluation, ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellants to present necessary documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 133 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207130</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, remanded a case involving the denial of CENVAT credit amounting to Rs.28,127 due to missing original invoices. The appellant located four additional invoices and requested a review. Despite a prolonged timeline and incremental submission of invoices, the tribunal granted a final opportunity for the original adjudicating authority to assess the four specific invoices. The appellant agreed to cease submitting invoices in fragments, limiting the request for CENVAT credit to the identified invoices only. The matter was remanded for thorough evaluation, ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellants to present necessary documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>