<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 446 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207122</link>
    <description>The High Court held that interest deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act is permissible for borrowed funds used for business purposes, even if for acquiring capital assets. The investment in shares of another company was deemed to facilitate business operations and technological advancements, qualifying as a business purpose. The Court dismissed the appeals and ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of interest paid on the borrowed capital.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 446 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207122</link>
      <description>The High Court held that interest deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act is permissible for borrowed funds used for business purposes, even if for acquiring capital assets. The investment in shares of another company was deemed to facilitate business operations and technological advancements, qualifying as a business purpose. The Court dismissed the appeals and ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of interest paid on the borrowed capital.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>