<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 386 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207110</link>
    <description>The case involved interpretation of agreements with consignment agents for sale of products, recovery of service tax under the C &amp;amp; F agent category, and the applicability of previous tribunal decisions. The original authority dropped the service tax recovery demand, which was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). However, the department&#039;s appeal led to the Tribunal setting aside previous orders and remanding the matter for fresh consideration based on a High Court decision. The Tribunal granted the department&#039;s request for de novo consideration by the original authority, allowing the appeal by way of remand and disposing of the cross objection accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 386 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207110</link>
      <description>The case involved interpretation of agreements with consignment agents for sale of products, recovery of service tax under the C &amp;amp; F agent category, and the applicability of previous tribunal decisions. The original authority dropped the service tax recovery demand, which was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals). However, the department&#039;s appeal led to the Tribunal setting aside previous orders and remanding the matter for fresh consideration based on a High Court decision. The Tribunal granted the department&#039;s request for de novo consideration by the original authority, allowing the appeal by way of remand and disposing of the cross objection accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>