<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 719 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Wealth-tax (Appeals)&#039;s order and confirmed the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s delay in filing returns lacked reasonable cause, rejecting the plea of ignorance of law. The penalties were upheld, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 719 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Wealth-tax (Appeals)&#039;s order and confirmed the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act. The Tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s delay in filing returns lacked reasonable cause, rejecting the plea of ignorance of law. The penalties were upheld, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>