https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207102 The Tribunal upheld the classification of the products under CETH 48.20 but set aside the penalty under Section 11AC and the demand beyond the normal period. The matter was remanded for recalculating the demand within the normal period, providing consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207102 The Tribunal upheld the classification of the products under CETH 48.20 but set aside the penalty under Section 11AC and the demand beyond the normal period. The matter was remanded for recalculating the demand within the normal period, providing consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207102