<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 279 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207097</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the deletion of the Rs. 31.54 crores adjustment for brand promotion expenses. It partly confirmed the Rs. 1.20 crores adjustment for raw material purchases with a 5% adjustment. The tribunal allowed the grounds on software expenditure and club expenses, while dismissing the grounds on depreciation and interest under section 234B, subject to consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 279 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207097</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the deletion of the Rs. 31.54 crores adjustment for brand promotion expenses. It partly confirmed the Rs. 1.20 crores adjustment for raw material purchases with a 5% adjustment. The tribunal allowed the grounds on software expenditure and club expenses, while dismissing the grounds on depreciation and interest under section 234B, subject to consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>