<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 268 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed a remand to verify the factual position regarding the availing of service tax credit by the appellant. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly, emphasizing the importance of clarifying the factual aspect before making a final determination in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 268 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed a remand to verify the factual position regarding the availing of service tax credit by the appellant. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly, emphasizing the importance of clarifying the factual aspect before making a final determination in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>