<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 715 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207076</link>
    <description>Exemption from customs duty on imported aircraft for non-scheduled air transport operations turned on whether the aircraft was approved and used as permitted by the competent civil aviation authority. The record supported the view that a non-scheduled passenger permit holder could use the aircraft for passenger and charter services, and the authority&#039;s letter supported that position. A claimed breach based on pre-publication of tariff could not justify interim recovery because it was not specifically raised in the show cause notice, and a party cannot be proceeded against on a ground not disclosed. The Tribunal therefore granted waiver of pre-deposit and recalled the deposit direction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 715 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207076</link>
      <description>Exemption from customs duty on imported aircraft for non-scheduled air transport operations turned on whether the aircraft was approved and used as permitted by the competent civil aviation authority. The record supported the view that a non-scheduled passenger permit holder could use the aircraft for passenger and charter services, and the authority&#039;s letter supported that position. A claimed breach based on pre-publication of tariff could not justify interim recovery because it was not specifically raised in the show cause notice, and a party cannot be proceeded against on a ground not disclosed. The Tribunal therefore granted waiver of pre-deposit and recalled the deposit direction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>