<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 790 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207068</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision that the liability to pay service tax by the recipient of service from a foreign provider without an establishment in India arises only from 18-4-2006. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the precedent set by the Bombay High Court judgment and interpreting relevant legal provisions in support of this conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 790 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207068</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision that the liability to pay service tax by the recipient of service from a foreign provider without an establishment in India arises only from 18-4-2006. The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the precedent set by the Bombay High Court judgment and interpreting relevant legal provisions in support of this conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>