<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 257 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207062</link>
    <description>A joint development agreement triggers deemed transfer under section 2(47)(v) only if it satisfies section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, including part performance and the transferee&#039;s readiness and willingness to perform; where those conditions are absent and consideration is not ascertainable with reasonable certainty, capital gains do not arise on execution alone. Surplus from sale of lands is taxable as capital gains, not business income, where the lands were held as investments, there was no systematic real estate trading, and surrounding circumstances such as zoning restrictions, impending acquisition, or litigation concerns explain the sales rather than an adventure in the nature of trade.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 257 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207062</link>
      <description>A joint development agreement triggers deemed transfer under section 2(47)(v) only if it satisfies section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, including part performance and the transferee&#039;s readiness and willingness to perform; where those conditions are absent and consideration is not ascertainable with reasonable certainty, capital gains do not arise on execution alone. Surplus from sale of lands is taxable as capital gains, not business income, where the lands were held as investments, there was no systematic real estate trading, and surrounding circumstances such as zoning restrictions, impending acquisition, or litigation concerns explain the sales rather than an adventure in the nature of trade.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>