<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 787 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207058</link>
    <description>HC held that section 80-IA(9) does not require reducing the profits allowed as deduction under section 80-IA(1) when computing other Chapter VI-A, Heading C deductions; it limits the allowability so the aggregate deduction under section 80-IA and other Heading C provisions cannot exceed 100% of profits. The court accepted that the undertaking was entitled to 80-IA and 80HHC deductions but subject to the overall cap, and decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 787 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207058</link>
      <description>HC held that section 80-IA(9) does not require reducing the profits allowed as deduction under section 80-IA(1) when computing other Chapter VI-A, Heading C deductions; it limits the allowability so the aggregate deduction under section 80-IA and other Heading C provisions cannot exceed 100% of profits. The court accepted that the undertaking was entitled to 80-IA and 80HHC deductions but subject to the overall cap, and decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>