<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 122 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207045</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the respondent for importing goods without an Importer-Exporter Code, as there was no evidence of misdeclaration or non-payment of customs duty. The appeal primarily focused on procedural aspects without providing essential details about the imported goods, leading the judge to find no valid reason to interfere with the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 122 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207045</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the respondent for importing goods without an Importer-Exporter Code, as there was no evidence of misdeclaration or non-payment of customs duty. The appeal primarily focused on procedural aspects without providing essential details about the imported goods, leading the judge to find no valid reason to interfere with the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>