<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 780 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207044</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the second respondent to send wheat samples for independent analysis to the Central Food Laboratory, Mysore, allowing the petitioner to prove the quality. The petitioner was instructed to bear expenses for the analysis, and goods were not to be auctioned until the report was received, with demurrage costs the petitioner&#039;s responsibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 780 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207044</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the second respondent to send wheat samples for independent analysis to the Central Food Laboratory, Mysore, allowing the petitioner to prove the quality. The petitioner was instructed to bear expenses for the analysis, and goods were not to be auctioned until the report was received, with demurrage costs the petitioner&#039;s responsibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>