<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 242 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount received on partition of HUF should not be treated as a gift and taxed under &quot;Income from Other Sources.&quot; The Tribunal recognized the validity of the partition from 31/3/2005, emphasizing that the receipt was a capital receipt exempt from taxation. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 242 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount received on partition of HUF should not be treated as a gift and taxed under &quot;Income from Other Sources.&quot; The Tribunal recognized the validity of the partition from 31/3/2005, emphasizing that the receipt was a capital receipt exempt from taxation. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>