<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 239 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207031</link>
    <description>ITAT, New Delhi held that exclusion of interest income attributable to the Dadra and Sambha unit for computing deduction under s.80IB was justified, ruling in favour of revenue on that point. Conversely, the tribunal found the AO&#039;s s.14A disallowance unsustainable because Rule 8D was inapplicable for the year and the AO failed to prove any expenditure related to exempt income; the Department&#039;s appeal on s.14A was dismissed and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 239 - ITAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207031</link>
      <description>ITAT, New Delhi held that exclusion of interest income attributable to the Dadra and Sambha unit for computing deduction under s.80IB was justified, ruling in favour of revenue on that point. Conversely, the tribunal found the AO&#039;s s.14A disallowance unsustainable because Rule 8D was inapplicable for the year and the AO failed to prove any expenditure related to exempt income; the Department&#039;s appeal on s.14A was dismissed and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>