<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 229 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207012</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellants in a dispute over duty payment on scrap of capital goods and inputs. The Tribunal found the revenue&#039;s challenge on limitation and merits of the case lacking, ultimately rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment highlighted the lack of evidence from the revenue to establish the origin of the scrap from modvatable capital goods, leading to the decision that the demand was barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 229 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207012</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the appellants in a dispute over duty payment on scrap of capital goods and inputs. The Tribunal found the revenue&#039;s challenge on limitation and merits of the case lacking, ultimately rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment highlighted the lack of evidence from the revenue to establish the origin of the scrap from modvatable capital goods, leading to the decision that the demand was barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=207012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>