<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 772 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206995</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of the notice for reassessment under section 147/148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2005-06. It ruled that the reassessment was not a mere change of opinion but fell within the provisions allowing for reassessment of under-assessed income. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to issue such notices and directed ongoing assessment proceedings without a final order pending further review, considering the technical nature of services provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 772 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206995</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of the notice for reassessment under section 147/148 of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2005-06. It ruled that the reassessment was not a mere change of opinion but fell within the provisions allowing for reassessment of under-assessed income. The Court emphasized the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to issue such notices and directed ongoing assessment proceedings without a final order pending further review, considering the technical nature of services provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>