<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 99 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206979</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and stay application. Emphasizing the importance of verifying relevant documents and avoiding duplicacy of claims, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for further examination to ensure the appellant&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat credit based on the receipt of goods and installation, despite the use of zerox copies of documents instead of original invoices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 99 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206979</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and stay application. Emphasizing the importance of verifying relevant documents and avoiding duplicacy of claims, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for further examination to ensure the appellant&#039;s entitlement to Cenvat credit based on the receipt of goods and installation, despite the use of zerox copies of documents instead of original invoices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>