<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 708 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206972</link>
    <description>CESTAT, Bangalore held that Revenue could not reject the declared transaction value absent evidence of contemporaneous imports of comparable goods at higher prices; without such details the Commissioner&#039;s rejection was invalid. Relying on the SC precedent, the tribunal found revision of price, demand for differential duty and interest, confiscation of the imported machine and penalties unsustainable. Decision entered in favor of the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 10:56:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 708 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206972</link>
      <description>CESTAT, Bangalore held that Revenue could not reject the declared transaction value absent evidence of contemporaneous imports of comparable goods at higher prices; without such details the Commissioner&#039;s rejection was invalid. Relying on the SC precedent, the tribunal found revision of price, demand for differential duty and interest, confiscation of the imported machine and penalties unsustainable. Decision entered in favor of the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>