<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 51 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206970</link>
    <description>HC held that reassessment under s.147 was invalid for AY 1999-00 because no information or material from an external source was brought to the department and the relevant facts were already on record; decision for the assessee. For AY 2000-01 the HC upheld reassessment in favor of the Revenue: the return was not taken up for scrutiny, change of opinion was not applicable, and the CIT(A) order in AY 2001-02 constituted information from an external source, justifying reopening.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 51 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206970</link>
      <description>HC held that reassessment under s.147 was invalid for AY 1999-00 because no information or material from an external source was brought to the department and the relevant facts were already on record; decision for the assessee. For AY 2000-01 the HC upheld reassessment in favor of the Revenue: the return was not taken up for scrutiny, change of opinion was not applicable, and the CIT(A) order in AY 2001-02 constituted information from an external source, justifying reopening.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>