<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 47 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206966</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for reassessment, citing factual errors and unconsidered evidence. The decision emphasized the importance of accurate factual findings in tax assessments and the necessity for proper judicial review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 47 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206966</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for reassessment, citing factual errors and unconsidered evidence. The decision emphasized the importance of accurate factual findings in tax assessments and the necessity for proper judicial review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>