https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206918 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI upheld the lower authorities' decision in a case involving conflict in pricing of imported Soga brand glassware. The Tribunal found that the Department's use of the 2001 price list for valuation was justified due to discrepancies and lack of evidence supporting the use of the 2002 price list. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the importer's appeal and affirmed the duty demand of Rs.9,87,304/- based on the 2001 price list. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206918 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI upheld the lower authorities' decision in a case involving conflict in pricing of imported Soga brand glassware. The Tribunal found that the Department's use of the 2001 price list for valuation was justified due to discrepancies and lack of evidence supporting the use of the 2002 price list. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the importer's appeal and affirmed the duty demand of Rs.9,87,304/- based on the 2001 price list. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206918