<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 198 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206917</link>
    <description>Misdeclaration of imported goods was established because the cargo was found to be iron pellets, not the declared non-alloy steel melting scrap, and that finding was not disputed. On that factual basis, confiscation under the Customs Act was sustained. The redemption fine and penalty were also upheld because they were considered modest in relation to the value of the goods, and no reduction was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 198 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206917</link>
      <description>Misdeclaration of imported goods was established because the cargo was found to be iron pellets, not the declared non-alloy steel melting scrap, and that finding was not disputed. On that factual basis, confiscation under the Customs Act was sustained. The redemption fine and penalty were also upheld because they were considered modest in relation to the value of the goods, and no reduction was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>