<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 674 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, maintaining the deletion of disallowance for overseas commission payments to group concerns abroad. It remitted the issue of domestic commission payments back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal upheld the legitimacy of international transactions involving group companies, differentiated tax deduction requirements for domestic and overseas commissions, and emphasized compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 674 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, maintaining the deletion of disallowance for overseas commission payments to group concerns abroad. It remitted the issue of domestic commission payments back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal upheld the legitimacy of international transactions involving group companies, differentiated tax deduction requirements for domestic and overseas commissions, and emphasized compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>