<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 84 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206890</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad dismissed the appeals seeking a refund of excess duty paid on High Sea Sale procurements, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) based on the time bar for filing the appeals. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for filing appeals and highlighted the legal implications of delays in seeking redressal for duty overpayments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 84 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206890</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad dismissed the appeals seeking a refund of excess duty paid on High Sea Sale procurements, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) based on the time bar for filing the appeals. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for filing appeals and highlighted the legal implications of delays in seeking redressal for duty overpayments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>