<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 83 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC was unsustainable due to the lack of determination of duty under Section 11A(2) and the revenue-neutral nature of the transaction. However, the demand for recovery of interest under Section 11AB was deemed sustainable for the period from 11/05/2001 onwards. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the penalty under Section 11AC being overturned and the interest recovery upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 83 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC was unsustainable due to the lack of determination of duty under Section 11A(2) and the revenue-neutral nature of the transaction. However, the demand for recovery of interest under Section 11AB was deemed sustainable for the period from 11/05/2001 onwards. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the penalty under Section 11AC being overturned and the interest recovery upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>