<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 756 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206880</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was not maintainable before it and should have been filed before the Supreme Court. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the impugned goods (LSHS) are not excisable due to their non-marketability, leading to no duty payable. The court dismissed the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 07:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 756 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206880</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act was not maintainable before it and should have been filed before the Supreme Court. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the impugned goods (LSHS) are not excisable due to their non-marketability, leading to no duty payable. The court dismissed the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>