https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206863 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that denied input service credit on service tax paid by the appellant to their Foreign Service provider after 18.04.2006. The Tribunal recognized the retrospective amendment in Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules through the Finance Act 2011, validating the appellant's claim for input service credit on service tax paid under section 66A of the Finance Act. As the authorities were unaware of the amendment at the time of issuing the order, the Tribunal found the impugned order lacked merit and ruled in favor of the appellant. en-us Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 07:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206863 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that denied input service credit on service tax paid by the appellant to their Foreign Service provider after 18.04.2006. The Tribunal recognized the retrospective amendment in Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules through the Finance Act 2011, validating the appellant's claim for input service credit on service tax paid under section 66A of the Finance Act. As the authorities were unaware of the amendment at the time of issuing the order, the Tribunal found the impugned order lacked merit and ruled in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206863